| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557558559560561562563564565566567568 |
- /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
- /*
- * Test cases for hash functions, including a benchmark. This is included by
- * KUnit test suites that want to use it. See sha512_kunit.c for an example.
- *
- * Copyright 2025 Google LLC
- */
- #include <kunit/run-in-irq-context.h>
- #include <kunit/test.h>
- #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
- /* test_buf is a guarded buffer, i.e. &test_buf[TEST_BUF_LEN] is not mapped. */
- #define TEST_BUF_LEN 16384
- static u8 *test_buf;
- static u8 *orig_test_buf;
- static u64 random_seed;
- /*
- * This is a simple linear congruential generator. It is used only for testing,
- * which does not require cryptographically secure random numbers. A hard-coded
- * algorithm is used instead of <linux/prandom.h> so that it matches the
- * algorithm used by the test vector generation script. This allows the input
- * data in random test vectors to be concisely stored as just the seed.
- */
- static u32 rand32(void)
- {
- random_seed = (random_seed * 25214903917 + 11) & ((1ULL << 48) - 1);
- return random_seed >> 16;
- }
- static void rand_bytes(u8 *out, size_t len)
- {
- for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i++)
- out[i] = rand32();
- }
- static void rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(u8 *out, size_t len)
- {
- random_seed = len;
- rand_bytes(out, len);
- }
- static bool rand_bool(void)
- {
- return rand32() % 2;
- }
- /* Generate a random length, preferring small lengths. */
- static size_t rand_length(size_t max_len)
- {
- size_t len;
- switch (rand32() % 3) {
- case 0:
- len = rand32() % 128;
- break;
- case 1:
- len = rand32() % 3072;
- break;
- default:
- len = rand32();
- break;
- }
- return len % (max_len + 1);
- }
- static size_t rand_offset(size_t max_offset)
- {
- return min(rand32() % 128, max_offset);
- }
- static int hash_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
- {
- /*
- * Allocate the test buffer using vmalloc() with a page-aligned length
- * so that it is immediately followed by a guard page. This allows
- * buffer overreads to be detected, even in assembly code.
- */
- size_t alloc_len = round_up(TEST_BUF_LEN, PAGE_SIZE);
- orig_test_buf = vmalloc(alloc_len);
- if (!orig_test_buf)
- return -ENOMEM;
- test_buf = orig_test_buf + alloc_len - TEST_BUF_LEN;
- return 0;
- }
- static void hash_suite_exit(struct kunit_suite *suite)
- {
- vfree(orig_test_buf);
- orig_test_buf = NULL;
- test_buf = NULL;
- }
- /*
- * Test the hash function against a list of test vectors.
- *
- * Note that it's only necessary to run each test vector in one way (e.g.,
- * one-shot instead of incremental), since consistency between different ways of
- * using the APIs is verified by other test cases.
- */
- static void test_hash_test_vectors(struct kunit *test)
- {
- for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_testvecs); i++) {
- size_t data_len = hash_testvecs[i].data_len;
- u8 actual_hash[HASH_SIZE];
- KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, data_len, TEST_BUF_LEN);
- rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(test_buf, data_len);
- HASH(test_buf, data_len, actual_hash);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, actual_hash, hash_testvecs[i].digest, HASH_SIZE,
- "Wrong result with test vector %zu; data_len=%zu", i,
- data_len);
- }
- }
- /*
- * Test that the hash function produces correct results for *every* length up to
- * 4096 bytes. To do this, generate seeded random data, then calculate a hash
- * value for each length 0..4096, then hash the hash values. Verify just the
- * final hash value, which should match only when all hash values were correct.
- */
- static void test_hash_all_lens_up_to_4096(struct kunit *test)
- {
- struct HASH_CTX ctx;
- u8 hash[HASH_SIZE];
- static_assert(TEST_BUF_LEN >= 4096);
- rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(test_buf, 4096);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- for (size_t len = 0; len <= 4096; len++) {
- HASH(test_buf, len, hash);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, hash, HASH_SIZE);
- }
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, hash);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ(test, hash, hash_testvec_consolidated, HASH_SIZE);
- }
- /*
- * Test that the hash function produces the same result with a one-shot
- * computation as it does with an incremental computation.
- */
- static void test_hash_incremental_updates(struct kunit *test)
- {
- for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
- size_t total_len, offset;
- struct HASH_CTX ctx;
- u8 hash1[HASH_SIZE];
- u8 hash2[HASH_SIZE];
- size_t num_parts = 0;
- size_t remaining_len, cur_offset;
- total_len = rand_length(TEST_BUF_LEN);
- offset = rand_offset(TEST_BUF_LEN - total_len);
- rand_bytes(&test_buf[offset], total_len);
- /* Compute the hash value in one shot. */
- HASH(&test_buf[offset], total_len, hash1);
- /*
- * Compute the hash value incrementally, using a randomly
- * selected sequence of update lengths that sum to total_len.
- */
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- remaining_len = total_len;
- cur_offset = offset;
- while (rand_bool()) {
- size_t part_len = rand_length(remaining_len);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, &test_buf[cur_offset], part_len);
- num_parts++;
- cur_offset += part_len;
- remaining_len -= part_len;
- }
- if (remaining_len != 0 || rand_bool()) {
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, &test_buf[cur_offset], remaining_len);
- num_parts++;
- }
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, hash2);
- /* Verify that the two hash values are the same. */
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, hash1, hash2, HASH_SIZE,
- "Incremental test failed with total_len=%zu num_parts=%zu offset=%zu",
- total_len, num_parts, offset);
- }
- }
- /*
- * Test that the hash function does not overrun any buffers. Uses a guard page
- * to catch buffer overruns even if they occur in assembly code.
- */
- static void test_hash_buffer_overruns(struct kunit *test)
- {
- const size_t max_tested_len = TEST_BUF_LEN - sizeof(struct HASH_CTX);
- void *const buf_end = &test_buf[TEST_BUF_LEN];
- struct HASH_CTX *guarded_ctx = buf_end - sizeof(*guarded_ctx);
- rand_bytes(test_buf, TEST_BUF_LEN);
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- size_t len = rand_length(max_tested_len);
- struct HASH_CTX ctx;
- u8 hash[HASH_SIZE];
- /* Check for overruns of the data buffer. */
- HASH(buf_end - len, len, hash);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, buf_end - len, len);
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, hash);
- /* Check for overruns of the hash value buffer. */
- HASH(test_buf, len, buf_end - HASH_SIZE);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, test_buf, len);
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, buf_end - HASH_SIZE);
- /* Check for overuns of the hash context. */
- HASH_INIT(guarded_ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(guarded_ctx, test_buf, len);
- HASH_FINAL(guarded_ctx, hash);
- }
- }
- /*
- * Test that the caller is permitted to alias the output digest and source data
- * buffer, and also modify the source data buffer after it has been used.
- */
- static void test_hash_overlaps(struct kunit *test)
- {
- const size_t max_tested_len = TEST_BUF_LEN - HASH_SIZE;
- struct HASH_CTX ctx;
- u8 hash[HASH_SIZE];
- rand_bytes(test_buf, TEST_BUF_LEN);
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- size_t len = rand_length(max_tested_len);
- size_t offset = HASH_SIZE + rand_offset(max_tested_len - len);
- bool left_end = rand_bool();
- u8 *ovl_hash = left_end ? &test_buf[offset] :
- &test_buf[offset + len - HASH_SIZE];
- HASH(&test_buf[offset], len, hash);
- HASH(&test_buf[offset], len, ovl_hash);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, hash, ovl_hash, HASH_SIZE,
- "Overlap test 1 failed with len=%zu offset=%zu left_end=%d",
- len, offset, left_end);
- /* Repeat the above test, but this time use init+update+final */
- HASH(&test_buf[offset], len, hash);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, &test_buf[offset], len);
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, ovl_hash);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, hash, ovl_hash, HASH_SIZE,
- "Overlap test 2 failed with len=%zu offset=%zu left_end=%d",
- len, offset, left_end);
- /* Test modifying the source data after it was used. */
- HASH(&test_buf[offset], len, hash);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, &test_buf[offset], len);
- rand_bytes(&test_buf[offset], len);
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, ovl_hash);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, hash, ovl_hash, HASH_SIZE,
- "Overlap test 3 failed with len=%zu offset=%zu left_end=%d",
- len, offset, left_end);
- }
- }
- /*
- * Test that if the same data is hashed at different alignments in memory, the
- * results are the same.
- */
- static void test_hash_alignment_consistency(struct kunit *test)
- {
- u8 hash1[128 + HASH_SIZE];
- u8 hash2[128 + HASH_SIZE];
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- size_t len = rand_length(TEST_BUF_LEN);
- size_t data_offs1 = rand_offset(TEST_BUF_LEN - len);
- size_t data_offs2 = rand_offset(TEST_BUF_LEN - len);
- size_t hash_offs1 = rand_offset(128);
- size_t hash_offs2 = rand_offset(128);
- rand_bytes(&test_buf[data_offs1], len);
- HASH(&test_buf[data_offs1], len, &hash1[hash_offs1]);
- memmove(&test_buf[data_offs2], &test_buf[data_offs1], len);
- HASH(&test_buf[data_offs2], len, &hash2[hash_offs2]);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, &hash1[hash_offs1], &hash2[hash_offs2], HASH_SIZE,
- "Alignment consistency test failed with len=%zu data_offs=(%zu,%zu) hash_offs=(%zu,%zu)",
- len, data_offs1, data_offs2, hash_offs1, hash_offs2);
- }
- }
- /* Test that HASH_FINAL zeroizes the context. */
- static void test_hash_ctx_zeroization(struct kunit *test)
- {
- static const u8 zeroes[sizeof(struct HASH_CTX)];
- struct HASH_CTX ctx;
- rand_bytes(test_buf, 128);
- HASH_INIT(&ctx);
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx, test_buf, 128);
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx, test_buf);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, &ctx, zeroes, sizeof(ctx),
- "Hash context was not zeroized by finalization");
- }
- #define IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN 256
- #define IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS 3 /* matches max concurrency level */
- struct hash_irq_test1_state {
- u8 expected_hashes[IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS][HASH_SIZE];
- atomic_t seqno;
- };
- /*
- * Compute the hash of one of the test messages and verify that it matches the
- * expected hash from @state->expected_hashes. To increase the chance of
- * detecting problems, cycle through multiple messages.
- */
- static bool hash_irq_test1_func(void *state_)
- {
- struct hash_irq_test1_state *state = state_;
- u32 i = (u32)atomic_inc_return(&state->seqno) % IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS;
- u8 actual_hash[HASH_SIZE];
- HASH(&test_buf[i * IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN], IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN, actual_hash);
- return memcmp(actual_hash, state->expected_hashes[i], HASH_SIZE) == 0;
- }
- /*
- * Test that if hashes are computed in task, softirq, and hardirq context
- * concurrently, then all results are as expected.
- */
- static void test_hash_interrupt_context_1(struct kunit *test)
- {
- struct hash_irq_test1_state state = {};
- /* Prepare some test messages and compute the expected hash of each. */
- rand_bytes(test_buf, IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS * IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN);
- for (int i = 0; i < IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS; i++)
- HASH(&test_buf[i * IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN], IRQ_TEST_DATA_LEN,
- state.expected_hashes[i]);
- kunit_run_irq_test(test, hash_irq_test1_func, 100000, &state);
- }
- struct hash_irq_test2_hash_ctx {
- struct HASH_CTX hash_ctx;
- atomic_t in_use;
- int offset;
- int step;
- };
- struct hash_irq_test2_state {
- struct hash_irq_test2_hash_ctx ctxs[IRQ_TEST_NUM_BUFFERS];
- u8 expected_hash[HASH_SIZE];
- u16 update_lens[32];
- int num_steps;
- };
- static bool hash_irq_test2_func(void *state_)
- {
- struct hash_irq_test2_state *state = state_;
- struct hash_irq_test2_hash_ctx *ctx;
- bool ret = true;
- for (ctx = &state->ctxs[0]; ctx < &state->ctxs[ARRAY_SIZE(state->ctxs)];
- ctx++) {
- if (atomic_cmpxchg(&ctx->in_use, 0, 1) == 0)
- break;
- }
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx == &state->ctxs[ARRAY_SIZE(state->ctxs)])) {
- /*
- * This should never happen, as the number of contexts is equal
- * to the maximum concurrency level of kunit_run_irq_test().
- */
- return false;
- }
- if (ctx->step == 0) {
- /* Init step */
- HASH_INIT(&ctx->hash_ctx);
- ctx->offset = 0;
- ctx->step++;
- } else if (ctx->step < state->num_steps - 1) {
- /* Update step */
- HASH_UPDATE(&ctx->hash_ctx, &test_buf[ctx->offset],
- state->update_lens[ctx->step - 1]);
- ctx->offset += state->update_lens[ctx->step - 1];
- ctx->step++;
- } else {
- /* Final step */
- u8 actual_hash[HASH_SIZE];
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->offset != TEST_BUF_LEN))
- ret = false;
- HASH_FINAL(&ctx->hash_ctx, actual_hash);
- if (memcmp(actual_hash, state->expected_hash, HASH_SIZE) != 0)
- ret = false;
- ctx->step = 0;
- }
- atomic_set_release(&ctx->in_use, 0);
- return ret;
- }
- /*
- * Test that if hashes are computed in task, softirq, and hardirq context
- * concurrently, *including doing different parts of the same incremental
- * computation in different contexts*, then all results are as expected.
- * Besides detecting bugs similar to those that test_hash_interrupt_context_1
- * can detect, this test case can also detect bugs where hash function
- * implementations don't correctly handle these mixed incremental computations.
- */
- static void test_hash_interrupt_context_2(struct kunit *test)
- {
- struct hash_irq_test2_state *state;
- int remaining = TEST_BUF_LEN;
- state = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, state);
- rand_bytes(test_buf, TEST_BUF_LEN);
- HASH(test_buf, TEST_BUF_LEN, state->expected_hash);
- /*
- * Generate a list of update lengths to use. Ensure that it contains
- * multiple entries but is limited to a maximum length.
- */
- static_assert(TEST_BUF_LEN / 4096 > 1);
- for (state->num_steps = 0;
- state->num_steps < ARRAY_SIZE(state->update_lens) - 1 && remaining;
- state->num_steps++) {
- state->update_lens[state->num_steps] =
- rand_length(min(remaining, 4096));
- remaining -= state->update_lens[state->num_steps];
- }
- if (remaining)
- state->update_lens[state->num_steps++] = remaining;
- state->num_steps += 2; /* for init and final */
- kunit_run_irq_test(test, hash_irq_test2_func, 250000, state);
- }
- #define UNKEYED_HASH_KUNIT_CASES \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_test_vectors), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_all_lens_up_to_4096), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_incremental_updates), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_buffer_overruns), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_overlaps), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_alignment_consistency), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_ctx_zeroization), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_interrupt_context_1), \
- KUNIT_CASE(test_hash_interrupt_context_2)
- /* benchmark_hash is omitted so that the suites can put it last. */
- #ifdef HMAC
- /*
- * Test the corresponding HMAC variant.
- *
- * This test case is fairly short, since HMAC is just a simple C wrapper around
- * the underlying unkeyed hash function, which is already well-tested by the
- * other test cases. It's not useful to test things like data alignment or
- * interrupt context again for HMAC, nor to have a long list of test vectors.
- *
- * Thus, just do a single consolidated test, which covers all data lengths up to
- * 4096 bytes and all key lengths up to 292 bytes. For each data length, select
- * a key length, generate the inputs from a seed, and compute the HMAC value.
- * Concatenate all these HMAC values together, and compute the HMAC of that.
- * Verify that value. If this fails, then the HMAC implementation is wrong.
- * This won't show which specific input failed, but that should be fine. Any
- * failure would likely be non-input-specific or also show in the unkeyed tests.
- */
- static void test_hmac(struct kunit *test)
- {
- static const u8 zeroes[sizeof(struct HMAC_CTX)];
- u8 *raw_key;
- struct HMAC_KEY key;
- struct HMAC_CTX ctx;
- u8 mac[HASH_SIZE];
- u8 mac2[HASH_SIZE];
- static_assert(TEST_BUF_LEN >= 4096 + 293);
- rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(test_buf, 4096);
- raw_key = &test_buf[4096];
- rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(raw_key, 32);
- HMAC_PREPAREKEY(&key, raw_key, 32);
- HMAC_INIT(&ctx, &key);
- for (size_t data_len = 0; data_len <= 4096; data_len++) {
- /*
- * Cycle through key lengths as well. Somewhat arbitrarily go
- * up to 293, which is somewhat larger than the largest hash
- * block size (which is the size at which the key starts being
- * hashed down to one block); going higher would not be useful.
- * To reduce correlation with data_len, use a prime number here.
- */
- size_t key_len = data_len % 293;
- HMAC_UPDATE(&ctx, test_buf, data_len);
- rand_bytes_seeded_from_len(raw_key, key_len);
- HMAC_USINGRAWKEY(raw_key, key_len, test_buf, data_len, mac);
- HMAC_UPDATE(&ctx, mac, HASH_SIZE);
- /* Verify that HMAC() is consistent with HMAC_USINGRAWKEY(). */
- HMAC_PREPAREKEY(&key, raw_key, key_len);
- HMAC(&key, test_buf, data_len, mac2);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG(
- test, mac, mac2, HASH_SIZE,
- "HMAC gave different results with raw and prepared keys");
- }
- HMAC_FINAL(&ctx, mac);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, mac, hmac_testvec_consolidated, HASH_SIZE,
- "HMAC gave wrong result");
- KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, &ctx, zeroes, sizeof(ctx),
- "HMAC context was not zeroized by finalization");
- }
- #define HASH_KUNIT_CASES UNKEYED_HASH_KUNIT_CASES, KUNIT_CASE(test_hmac)
- #else
- #define HASH_KUNIT_CASES UNKEYED_HASH_KUNIT_CASES
- #endif
- /* Benchmark the hash function on various data lengths. */
- static void benchmark_hash(struct kunit *test)
- {
- static const size_t lens_to_test[] = {
- 1, 16, 64, 127, 128, 200, 256,
- 511, 512, 1024, 3173, 4096, 16384,
- };
- u8 hash[HASH_SIZE];
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_BENCHMARK))
- kunit_skip(test, "not enabled");
- /* Warm-up */
- for (size_t i = 0; i < 10000000; i += TEST_BUF_LEN)
- HASH(test_buf, TEST_BUF_LEN, hash);
- for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lens_to_test); i++) {
- size_t len = lens_to_test[i];
- /* The '+ 128' tries to account for per-message overhead. */
- size_t num_iters = 10000000 / (len + 128);
- u64 t;
- KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, len, TEST_BUF_LEN);
- preempt_disable();
- t = ktime_get_ns();
- for (size_t j = 0; j < num_iters; j++)
- HASH(test_buf, len, hash);
- t = ktime_get_ns() - t;
- preempt_enable();
- kunit_info(test, "len=%zu: %llu MB/s", len,
- div64_u64((u64)len * num_iters * 1000, t ?: 1));
- }
- }
|