| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557558559560561562563564565566567568569570571572573574575576577578579580581582583584585586587588589590 |
- // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
- /*
- * Timer events oriented CPU idle governor
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2018 - 2021 Intel Corporation
- * Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
- */
- /**
- * DOC: teo-description
- *
- * The idea of this governor is based on the observation that on many systems
- * timer interrupts are two or more orders of magnitude more frequent than any
- * other interrupt types, so they are likely to dominate CPU wakeup patterns.
- * Moreover, in principle, the time when the next timer event is going to occur
- * can be determined at the idle state selection time, although doing that may
- * be costly, so it can be regarded as the most reliable source of information
- * for idle state selection.
- *
- * Of course, non-timer wakeup sources are more important in some use cases,
- * but even then it is generally unnecessary to consider idle duration values
- * greater than the time till the next timer event, referred as the sleep
- * length in what follows, because the closest timer will ultimately wake up the
- * CPU anyway unless it is woken up earlier.
- *
- * However, since obtaining the sleep length may be costly, the governor first
- * checks if it can select a shallow idle state using wakeup pattern information
- * from recent times, in which case it can do without knowing the sleep length
- * at all. For this purpose, it counts CPU wakeup events and looks for an idle
- * state whose target residency has not exceeded the idle duration (measured
- * after wakeup) in the majority of relevant recent cases. If the target
- * residency of that state is small enough, it may be used right away and the
- * sleep length need not be determined.
- *
- * The computations carried out by this governor are based on using bins whose
- * boundaries are aligned with the target residency parameter values of the CPU
- * idle states provided by the %CPUIdle driver in the ascending order. That is,
- * the first bin spans from 0 up to, but not including, the target residency of
- * the second idle state (idle state 1), the second bin spans from the target
- * residency of idle state 1 up to, but not including, the target residency of
- * idle state 2, the third bin spans from the target residency of idle state 2
- * up to, but not including, the target residency of idle state 3 and so on.
- * The last bin spans from the target residency of the deepest idle state
- * supplied by the driver to infinity.
- *
- * Two metrics called "hits" and "intercepts" are associated with each bin.
- * They are updated every time before selecting an idle state for the given CPU
- * in accordance with what happened last time.
- *
- * The "hits" metric reflects the relative frequency of situations in which the
- * sleep length and the idle duration measured after CPU wakeup are close enough
- * (that is, the CPU appears to wake up "on time" relative to the sleep length).
- * In turn, the "intercepts" metric reflects the relative frequency of non-timer
- * wakeup events for which the measured idle duration is significantly different
- * from the sleep length (these events are also referred to as "intercepts"
- * below).
- *
- * The governor also counts "intercepts" with the measured idle duration below
- * the tick period length and uses this information when deciding whether or not
- * to stop the scheduler tick.
- *
- * In order to select an idle state for a CPU, the governor takes the following
- * steps (modulo the possible latency constraint that must be taken into account
- * too):
- *
- * 1. Find the deepest enabled CPU idle state (the candidate idle state) and
- * compute 2 sums as follows:
- *
- * - The sum of the "hits" metric for all of the idle states shallower than
- * the candidate one (it represents the cases in which the CPU was likely
- * woken up by a timer).
- *
- * - The sum of the "intercepts" metric for all of the idle states shallower
- * than the candidate one (it represents the cases in which the CPU was
- * likely woken up by a non-timer wakeup source).
- *
- * Also find the idle state with the maximum intercepts metric (if there are
- * multiple states with the maximum intercepts metric, choose the one with
- * the highest index).
- *
- * 2. If the second sum computed in step 1 is greater than a half of the sum of
- * both metrics for the candidate state bin and all subsequent bins (if any),
- * a shallower idle state is likely to be more suitable, so look for it.
- *
- * - Traverse the enabled idle states shallower than the candidate one in the
- * descending order, starting at the state with the maximum intercepts
- * metric found in step 1.
- *
- * - For each of them compute the sum of the "intercepts" metrics over all
- * of the idle states between it and the candidate one (including the
- * former and excluding the latter).
- *
- * - If this sum is greater than a half of the second sum computed in step 1,
- * use the given idle state as the new candidate one.
- *
- * 3. If the current candidate state is state 0 or its target residency is short
- * enough, return it and prevent the scheduler tick from being stopped.
- *
- * 4. Obtain the sleep length value and check if it is below the target
- * residency of the current candidate state, in which case a new shallower
- * candidate state needs to be found, so look for it.
- */
- #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
- #include <linux/jiffies.h>
- #include <linux/kernel.h>
- #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
- #include <linux/tick.h>
- #include "gov.h"
- /*
- * Idle state exit latency threshold used for deciding whether or not to check
- * the time till the closest expected timer event.
- */
- #define LATENCY_THRESHOLD_NS (RESIDENCY_THRESHOLD_NS / 2)
- /*
- * The PULSE value is added to metrics when they grow and the DECAY_SHIFT value
- * is used for decreasing metrics on a regular basis.
- */
- #define PULSE 1024
- #define DECAY_SHIFT 3
- /**
- * struct teo_bin - Metrics used by the TEO cpuidle governor.
- * @intercepts: The "intercepts" metric.
- * @hits: The "hits" metric.
- */
- struct teo_bin {
- unsigned int intercepts;
- unsigned int hits;
- };
- /**
- * struct teo_cpu - CPU data used by the TEO cpuidle governor.
- * @sleep_length_ns: Time till the closest timer event (at the selection time).
- * @state_bins: Idle state data bins for this CPU.
- * @total: Grand total of the "intercepts" and "hits" metrics for all bins.
- * @total_tick: Wakeups by the scheduler tick.
- * @tick_intercepts: "Intercepts" before TICK_NSEC.
- * @short_idles: Wakeups after short idle periods.
- * @tick_wakeup: Set if the last wakeup was by the scheduler tick.
- */
- struct teo_cpu {
- s64 sleep_length_ns;
- struct teo_bin state_bins[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX];
- unsigned int total;
- unsigned int total_tick;
- unsigned int tick_intercepts;
- unsigned int short_idles;
- bool tick_wakeup;
- };
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct teo_cpu, teo_cpus);
- static void teo_decay(unsigned int *metric)
- {
- unsigned int delta = *metric >> DECAY_SHIFT;
- if (delta)
- *metric -= delta;
- else
- *metric = 0;
- }
- /**
- * teo_update - Update CPU metrics after wakeup.
- * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
- * @dev: Target CPU.
- */
- static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
- {
- s64 lat_ns = drv->states[dev->last_state_idx].exit_latency_ns;
- struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = this_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus);
- int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
- s64 target_residency_ns, measured_ns;
- unsigned int total = 0;
- teo_decay(&cpu_data->short_idles);
- if (dev->poll_time_limit) {
- dev->poll_time_limit = false;
- /*
- * Polling state timeout has triggered, so assume that this
- * might have been a long sleep.
- */
- measured_ns = S64_MAX;
- } else {
- measured_ns = dev->last_residency_ns;
- /*
- * The delay between the wakeup and the first instruction
- * executed by the CPU is not likely to be worst-case every
- * time, so take 1/2 of the exit latency as a very rough
- * approximation of the average of it.
- */
- if (measured_ns >= lat_ns) {
- measured_ns -= lat_ns / 2;
- if (measured_ns < RESIDENCY_THRESHOLD_NS)
- cpu_data->short_idles += PULSE;
- } else {
- measured_ns /= 2;
- cpu_data->short_idles += PULSE;
- }
- }
- /*
- * Decay the "hits" and "intercepts" metrics for all of the bins and
- * find the bins that the sleep length and the measured idle duration
- * fall into.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
- struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
- teo_decay(&bin->hits);
- total += bin->hits;
- teo_decay(&bin->intercepts);
- total += bin->intercepts;
- target_residency_ns = drv->states[i].target_residency_ns;
- if (target_residency_ns <= cpu_data->sleep_length_ns) {
- idx_timer = i;
- if (target_residency_ns <= measured_ns)
- idx_duration = i;
- }
- }
- cpu_data->total = total + PULSE;
- teo_decay(&cpu_data->tick_intercepts);
- teo_decay(&cpu_data->total_tick);
- if (cpu_data->tick_wakeup) {
- cpu_data->total_tick += PULSE;
- /*
- * If tick wakeups dominate the wakeup pattern, count this one
- * as a hit on the deepest available idle state to increase the
- * likelihood of stopping the tick.
- */
- if (3 * cpu_data->total_tick > 2 * cpu_data->total) {
- cpu_data->state_bins[drv->state_count-1].hits += PULSE;
- return;
- }
- /*
- * If intercepts within the tick period range are not frequent
- * enough, count this wakeup as a hit, since it is likely that
- * the tick has woken up the CPU because an expected intercept
- * was not there. Otherwise, one of the intercepts may have
- * been incidentally preceded by the tick wakeup.
- */
- if (3 * cpu_data->tick_intercepts < 2 * total) {
- cpu_data->state_bins[idx_timer].hits += PULSE;
- return;
- }
- }
- /*
- * If the measured idle duration (adjusted for the entered state exit
- * latency) falls into the same bin as the sleep length and the latter
- * is less than the "raw" measured idle duration (so the wakeup appears
- * to have occurred after the anticipated timer event), this is a "hit",
- * so update the "hits" metric for that bin.
- *
- * Otherwise, update the "intercepts" metric for the bin fallen into by
- * the measured idle duration.
- */
- if (idx_timer == idx_duration &&
- cpu_data->sleep_length_ns - measured_ns < lat_ns / 2) {
- cpu_data->state_bins[idx_timer].hits += PULSE;
- } else {
- cpu_data->state_bins[idx_duration].intercepts += PULSE;
- if (measured_ns <= TICK_NSEC)
- cpu_data->tick_intercepts += PULSE;
- }
- }
- /**
- * teo_find_shallower_state - Find shallower idle state matching given duration.
- * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
- * @dev: Target CPU.
- * @state_idx: Index of the capping idle state.
- * @duration_ns: Idle duration value to match.
- */
- static int teo_find_shallower_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
- struct cpuidle_device *dev, int state_idx,
- s64 duration_ns)
- {
- int i;
- for (i = state_idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
- continue;
- state_idx = i;
- if (drv->states[i].target_residency_ns <= duration_ns)
- break;
- }
- return state_idx;
- }
- /**
- * teo_select - Selects the next idle state to enter.
- * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
- * @dev: Target CPU.
- * @stop_tick: Indication on whether or not to stop the scheduler tick.
- */
- static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
- bool *stop_tick)
- {
- struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = this_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus);
- s64 latency_req = cpuidle_governor_latency_req(dev->cpu);
- ktime_t delta_tick = TICK_NSEC / 2;
- unsigned int idx_intercept_sum = 0;
- unsigned int intercept_sum = 0;
- unsigned int intercept_max = 0;
- unsigned int idx_hit_sum = 0;
- unsigned int hit_sum = 0;
- int intercept_max_idx = -1;
- int constraint_idx = 0;
- int idx0 = 0, idx = -1;
- s64 duration_ns;
- int i;
- if (dev->last_state_idx >= 0) {
- teo_update(drv, dev);
- dev->last_state_idx = -1;
- }
- /*
- * Set the sleep length to infinity in case the invocation of
- * tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() below is skipped, in which case it won't
- * be known whether or not the subsequent wakeup is caused by a timer.
- * It is generally fine to count the wakeup as an intercept then, except
- * for the cases when the CPU is mostly woken up by timers and there may
- * be opportunities to ask for a deeper idle state when no imminent
- * timers are scheduled which may be missed.
- */
- cpu_data->sleep_length_ns = KTIME_MAX;
- if (!dev->states_usage[0].disable)
- idx = 0;
- /*
- * Compute the sums of metrics for early wakeup pattern detection and
- * look for the state bin with the maximum intercepts metric below the
- * deepest enabled one (if there are multiple states with the maximum
- * intercepts metric, choose the one with the highest index).
- */
- for (i = 1; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
- struct teo_bin *prev_bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i-1];
- unsigned int prev_intercepts = prev_bin->intercepts;
- struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
- /*
- * Update the sums of idle state metrics for all of the states
- * shallower than the current one.
- */
- hit_sum += prev_bin->hits;
- intercept_sum += prev_intercepts;
- /*
- * Check if this is the bin with the maximum number of
- * intercepts so far and in that case update the index of
- * the state with the maximum intercepts metric.
- */
- if (prev_intercepts >= intercept_max) {
- intercept_max = prev_intercepts;
- intercept_max_idx = i - 1;
- }
- if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
- continue;
- if (idx < 0)
- idx0 = i; /* first enabled state */
- idx = i;
- if (s->exit_latency_ns <= latency_req)
- constraint_idx = i;
- /* Save the sums for the current state. */
- idx_intercept_sum = intercept_sum;
- idx_hit_sum = hit_sum;
- }
- /* Avoid unnecessary overhead. */
- if (idx < 0) {
- idx = 0; /* No states enabled, must use 0. */
- goto out_tick;
- }
- if (idx == idx0) {
- /*
- * Only one idle state is enabled, so use it, but do not
- * allow the tick to be stopped it is shallow enough.
- */
- duration_ns = drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns;
- goto end;
- }
- /*
- * If the sum of the intercepts metric for all of the idle states
- * shallower than the current candidate one (idx) is greater than the
- * sum of the intercepts and hits metrics for the candidate state and
- * all of the deeper states, a shallower idle state is likely to be a
- * better choice.
- */
- if (2 * idx_intercept_sum > cpu_data->total - idx_hit_sum) {
- int min_idx = idx0;
- if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
- /*
- * Look for the shallowest idle state below the current
- * candidate one whose target residency is at least
- * equal to the tick period length.
- */
- while (min_idx < idx &&
- drv->states[min_idx].target_residency_ns < TICK_NSEC)
- min_idx++;
- /*
- * Avoid selecting a state with a lower index, but with
- * the same target residency as the current candidate
- * one.
- */
- if (drv->states[min_idx].target_residency_ns ==
- drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns)
- goto constraint;
- }
- /*
- * If the minimum state index is greater than or equal to the
- * index of the state with the maximum intercepts metric and
- * the corresponding state is enabled, there is no need to look
- * at the deeper states.
- */
- if (min_idx >= intercept_max_idx &&
- !dev->states_usage[min_idx].disable) {
- idx = min_idx;
- goto constraint;
- }
- /*
- * Look for the deepest enabled idle state, at most as deep as
- * the one with the maximum intercepts metric, whose target
- * residency had not been greater than the idle duration in over
- * a half of the relevant cases in the past.
- *
- * Take the possible duration limitation present if the tick
- * has been stopped already into account.
- */
- for (i = idx - 1, intercept_sum = 0; i >= min_idx; i--) {
- intercept_sum += cpu_data->state_bins[i].intercepts;
- if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
- continue;
- idx = i;
- if (2 * intercept_sum > idx_intercept_sum &&
- i <= intercept_max_idx)
- break;
- }
- }
- constraint:
- /*
- * If there is a latency constraint, it may be necessary to select an
- * idle state shallower than the current candidate one.
- */
- if (idx > constraint_idx)
- idx = constraint_idx;
- /*
- * If either the candidate state is state 0 or its target residency is
- * low enough, there is basically nothing more to do, but if the sleep
- * length is not updated, the subsequent wakeup will be counted as an
- * "intercept" which may be problematic in the cases when timer wakeups
- * are dominant. Namely, it may effectively prevent deeper idle states
- * from being selected at one point even if no imminent timers are
- * scheduled.
- *
- * However, frequent timers in the RESIDENCY_THRESHOLD_NS range on one
- * CPU are unlikely (user space has a default 50 us slack value for
- * hrtimers and there are relatively few timers with a lower deadline
- * value in the kernel), and even if they did happen, the potential
- * benefit from using a deep idle state in that case would be
- * questionable anyway for latency reasons. Thus if the measured idle
- * duration falls into that range in the majority of cases, assume
- * non-timer wakeups to be dominant and skip updating the sleep length
- * to reduce latency.
- *
- * Also, if the latency constraint is sufficiently low, it will force
- * shallow idle states regardless of the wakeup type, so the sleep
- * length need not be known in that case.
- */
- if ((!idx || drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns < RESIDENCY_THRESHOLD_NS) &&
- (2 * cpu_data->short_idles >= cpu_data->total ||
- latency_req < LATENCY_THRESHOLD_NS))
- goto out_tick;
- duration_ns = tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(&delta_tick);
- cpu_data->sleep_length_ns = duration_ns;
- if (!idx)
- goto out_tick;
- /*
- * If the closest expected timer is before the target residency of the
- * candidate state, a shallower one needs to be found.
- */
- if (drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns > duration_ns)
- idx = teo_find_shallower_state(drv, dev, idx, duration_ns);
- /*
- * If the selected state's target residency is below the tick length
- * and intercepts occurring before the tick length are the majority of
- * total wakeup events, do not stop the tick.
- */
- if (drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns < TICK_NSEC &&
- 3 * cpu_data->tick_intercepts >= 2 * cpu_data->total)
- duration_ns = TICK_NSEC / 2;
- end:
- /*
- * Allow the tick to be stopped unless the selected state is a polling
- * one or the expected idle duration is shorter than the tick period
- * length.
- */
- if ((!(drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) &&
- duration_ns >= TICK_NSEC) || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
- return idx;
- /*
- * The tick is not going to be stopped, so if the target residency of
- * the state to be returned is not within the time till the closest
- * timer including the tick, try to correct that.
- */
- if (idx > idx0 &&
- drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns > delta_tick)
- idx = teo_find_shallower_state(drv, dev, idx, delta_tick);
- out_tick:
- *stop_tick = false;
- return idx;
- }
- /**
- * teo_reflect - Note that governor data for the CPU need to be updated.
- * @dev: Target CPU.
- * @state: Entered state.
- */
- static void teo_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int state)
- {
- struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = this_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus);
- cpu_data->tick_wakeup = tick_nohz_idle_got_tick();
- dev->last_state_idx = state;
- }
- /**
- * teo_enable_device - Initialize the governor's data for the target CPU.
- * @drv: cpuidle driver (not used).
- * @dev: Target CPU.
- */
- static int teo_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
- struct cpuidle_device *dev)
- {
- struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
- memset(cpu_data, 0, sizeof(*cpu_data));
- return 0;
- }
- static struct cpuidle_governor teo_governor = {
- .name = "teo",
- .rating = 19,
- .enable = teo_enable_device,
- .select = teo_select,
- .reflect = teo_reflect,
- };
- static int __init teo_governor_init(void)
- {
- return cpuidle_register_governor(&teo_governor);
- }
- postcore_initcall(teo_governor_init);
|