| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647 |
- .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later
- .. c:namespace:: V4L
- .. _rw:
- **********
- Read/Write
- **********
- Input and output devices support the :c:func:`read()` and
- :c:func:`write()` function, respectively, when the
- ``V4L2_CAP_READWRITE`` flag in the ``capabilities`` field of struct
- :c:type:`v4l2_capability` returned by the
- :ref:`VIDIOC_QUERYCAP` ioctl is set.
- Drivers may need the CPU to copy the data, but they may also support DMA
- to or from user memory, so this I/O method is not necessarily less
- efficient than other methods merely exchanging buffer pointers. It is
- considered inferior though because no meta-information like frame
- counters or timestamps are passed. This information is necessary to
- recognize frame dropping and to synchronize with other data streams.
- However this is also the simplest I/O method, requiring little or no
- setup to exchange data. It permits command line stunts like this (the
- vidctrl tool is fictitious):
- .. code-block:: none
- $ vidctrl /dev/video --input=0 --format=YUYV --size=352x288
- $ dd if=/dev/video of=myimage.422 bs=202752 count=1
- To read from the device applications use the :c:func:`read()`
- function, to write the :c:func:`write()` function. Drivers
- must implement one I/O method if they exchange data with applications,
- but it need not be this. [#f1]_ When reading or writing is supported, the
- driver must also support the :c:func:`select()` and
- :c:func:`poll()` function. [#f2]_
- .. [#f1]
- It would be desirable if applications could depend on drivers
- supporting all I/O interfaces, but as much as the complex memory
- mapping I/O can be inadequate for some devices we have no reason to
- require this interface, which is most useful for simple applications
- capturing still images.
- .. [#f2]
- At the driver level :c:func:`select()` and :c:func:`poll()` are
- the same, and :c:func:`select()` is too important to be optional.
|