| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336 |
- ==========================
- Bulk Register Access (BRA)
- ==========================
- Conventions
- -----------
- Capitalized words used in this documentation are intentional and refer
- to concepts of the SoundWire 1.x specification.
- Introduction
- ------------
- The SoundWire 1.x specification provides a mechanism to speed-up
- command/control transfers by reclaiming parts of the audio
- bandwidth. The Bulk Register Access (BRA) protocol is a standard
- solution based on the Bulk Payload Transport (BPT) definitions.
- The regular control channel uses Column 0 and can only send/retrieve
- one byte per frame with write/read commands. With a typical 48kHz
- frame rate, only 48kB/s can be transferred.
- The optional Bulk Register Access capability can transmit up to 12
- Mbits/s and reduce transfer times by several orders of magnitude, but
- has multiple design constraints:
- (1) Each frame can only support a read or a write transfer, with a
- 10-byte overhead per frame (header and footer response).
- (2) The read/writes SHALL be from/to contiguous register addresses
- in the same frame. A fragmented register space decreases the
- efficiency of the protocol by requiring multiple BRA transfers
- scheduled in different frames.
- (3) The targeted Peripheral device SHALL support the optional Data
- Port 0, and likewise the Manager SHALL expose audio-like Ports
- to insert BRA packets in the audio payload using the concepts of
- Sample Interval, HSTART, HSTOP, etc.
- (4) The BRA transport efficiency depends on the available
- bandwidth. If there are no on-going audio transfers, the entire
- frame minus Column 0 can be reclaimed for BRA. The frame shape
- also impacts efficiency: since Column0 cannot be used for
- BTP/BRA, the frame should rely on a large number of columns and
- minimize the number of rows. The bus clock should be as high as
- possible.
- (5) The number of bits transferred per frame SHALL be a multiple of
- 8 bits. Padding bits SHALL be inserted if necessary at the end
- of the data.
- (6) The regular read/write commands can be issued in parallel with
- BRA transfers. This is convenient to e.g. deal with alerts, jack
- detection or change the volume during firmware download, but
- accessing the same address with two independent protocols has to
- be avoided to avoid undefined behavior.
- (7) Some implementations may not be capable of handling the
- bandwidth of the BRA protocol, e.g. in the case of a slow I2C
- bus behind the SoundWire IP. In this case, the transfers may
- need to be spaced in time or flow-controlled.
- (8) Each BRA packet SHALL be marked as 'Active' when valid data is
- to be transmitted. This allows for software to allocate a BRA
- stream but not transmit/discard data while processing the
- results or preparing the next batch of data, or allowing the
- peripheral to deal with the previous transfer. In addition BRA
- transfer can be started early on without data being ready.
- (9) Up to 470 bytes may be transmitted per frame.
- (10) The address is represented with 32 bits and does not rely on
- the paging registers used for the regular command/control
- protocol in Column 0.
- Error checking
- --------------
- Firmware download is one of the key usages of the Bulk Register Access
- protocol. To make sure the binary data integrity is not compromised by
- transmission or programming errors, each BRA packet provides:
- (1) A CRC on the 7-byte header. This CRC helps the Peripheral Device
- check if it is addressed and set the start address and number of
- bytes. The Peripheral Device provides a response in Byte 7.
- (2) A CRC on the data block (header excluded). This CRC is
- transmitted as the last-but-one byte in the packet, prior to the
- footer response.
- The header response can be one of:
- (a) Ack
- (b) Nak
- (c) Not Ready
- The footer response can be one of:
- (1) Ack
- (2) Nak (CRC failure)
- (3) Good (operation completed)
- (4) Bad (operation failed)
- Example frame
- -------------
- The example below is not to scale and makes simplifying assumptions
- for clarity. The different chunks in the BRA packets are not required
- to start on a new SoundWire Row, and the scale of data may vary.
- ::
- +---+--------------------------------------------+
- + | |
- + | BRA HEADER |
- + | |
- + +--------------------------------------------+
- + C | HEADER CRC |
- + O +--------------------------------------------+
- + M | HEADER RESPONSE |
- + M +--------------------------------------------+
- + A | |
- + N | |
- + D | DATA |
- + | |
- + | |
- + | |
- + +--------------------------------------------+
- + | DATA CRC |
- + +--------------------------------------------+
- + | FOOTER RESPONSE |
- +---+--------------------------------------------+
- Assuming the frame uses N columns, the configuration shown above can
- be programmed by setting the DP0 registers as:
- - HSTART = 1
- - HSTOP = N - 1
- - Sampling Interval = N
- - WordLength = N - 1
- Addressing restrictions
- -----------------------
- The Device Number specified in the Header follows the SoundWire
- definitions, and broadcast and group addressing are permitted. For now
- the Linux implementation only allows for a single BPT transfer to a
- single device at a time. This might be revisited at a later point as
- an optimization to send the same firmware to multiple devices, but
- this would only be beneficial for single-link solutions.
- In the case of multiple Peripheral devices attached to different
- Managers, the broadcast and group addressing is not supported by the
- SoundWire specification. Each device must be handled with separate BRA
- streams, possibly in parallel - the links are really independent.
- Unsupported features
- --------------------
- The Bulk Register Access specification provides a number of
- capabilities that are not supported in known implementations, such as:
- (1) Transfers initiated by a Peripheral Device. The BRA Initiator is
- always the Manager Device.
- (2) Flow-control capabilities and retransmission based on the
- 'NotReady' header response require extra buffering in the
- SoundWire IP and are not implemented.
- Bi-directional handling
- -----------------------
- The BRA protocol can handle writes as well as reads, and in each
- packet the header and footer response are provided by the Peripheral
- Target device. On the Peripheral device, the BRA protocol is handled
- by a single DP0 data port, and at the low-level the bus ownership can
- will change for header/footer response as well as the data transmitted
- during a read.
- On the host side, most implementations rely on a Port-like concept,
- with two FIFOs consuming/generating data transfers in parallel
- (Host->Peripheral and Peripheral->Host). The amount of data
- consumed/produced by these FIFOs is not symmetrical, as a result
- hardware typically inserts markers to help software and hardware
- interpret raw data
- Each packet will typically have:
- (1) a 'Start of Packet' indicator.
- (2) an 'End of Packet' indicator.
- (3) a packet identifier to correlate the data requested and
- transmitted, and the error status for each frame
- Hardware implementations can check errors at the frame level, and
- retry a transfer in case of errors. However, as for the flow-control
- case, this requires extra buffering and intelligence in the
- hardware. The Linux support assumes that the entire transfer is
- cancelled if a single error is detected in one of the responses.
- Abstraction required
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- There are no standard registers or mandatory implementation at the
- Manager level, so the low-level BPT/BRA details must be hidden in
- Manager-specific code. For example the Cadence IP format above is not
- known to the codec drivers.
- Likewise, codec drivers should not have to know the frame size. The
- computation of CRC and handling of responses is handled in helpers and
- Manager-specific code.
- The host BRA driver may also have restrictions on pages allocated for
- DMA, or other host-DSP communication protocols. The codec driver
- should not be aware of any of these restrictions, since it might be
- reused in combination with different implementations of Manager IPs.
- Concurrency between BRA and regular read/write
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- The existing 'nread/nwrite' API already relies on a notion of start
- address and number of bytes, so it would be possible to extend this
- API with a 'hint' requesting BPT/BRA be used.
- However BRA transfers could be quite long, and the use of a single
- mutex for regular read/write and BRA is a show-stopper. Independent
- operation of the control/command and BRA transfers is a fundamental
- requirement, e.g. to change the volume level with the existing regmap
- interface while downloading firmware. The integration must however
- ensure that there are no concurrent access to the same address with
- the command/control protocol and the BRA protocol.
- In addition, the 'sdw_msg' structure hard-codes support for 16-bit
- addresses and paging registers which are irrelevant for BPT/BRA
- support based on native 32-bit addresses. A separate API with
- 'sdw_bpt_msg' makes more sense.
- One possible strategy to speed-up all initialization tasks would be to
- start a BRA transfer for firmware download, then deal with all the
- "regular" read/writes in parallel with the command channel, and last
- to wait for the BRA transfers to complete. This would allow for a
- degree of overlap instead of a purely sequential solution. As such,
- the BRA API must support async transfers and expose a separate wait
- function.
- Peripheral/bus interface
- ------------------------
- The bus interface for BPT/BRA is made of two functions:
- - sdw_bpt_send_async(bpt_message)
- This function sends the data using the Manager
- implementation-defined capabilities (typically DMA or IPC
- protocol).
- Queueing is currently not supported, the caller
- needs to wait for completion of the requested transfer.
- - sdw_bpt_wait()
- This function waits for the entire message provided by the
- codec driver in the 'send_async' stage. Intermediate status for
- smaller chunks will not be provided back to the codec driver,
- only a return code will be provided.
- Regmap use
- ~~~~~~~~~~
- Existing codec drivers rely on regmap to download firmware to
- Peripherals. regmap exposes an async interface similar to the
- send/wait API suggested above, so at a high-level it would seem
- natural to combine BRA and regmap. The regmap layer could check if BRA
- is available or not, and use a regular read-write command channel in
- the latter case.
- The regmap integration will be handled in a second step.
- BRA stream model
- ----------------
- For regular audio transfers, the machine driver exposes a dailink
- connecting CPU DAI(s) and Codec DAI(s).
- This model is not required BRA support:
- (1) The SoundWire DAIs are mainly wrappers for SoundWire Data
- Ports, with possibly some analog or audio conversion
- capabilities bolted behind the Data Port. In the context of
- BRA, the DP0 is the destination. DP0 registers are standard and
- can be programmed blindly without knowing what Peripheral is
- connected to each link. In addition, if there are multiple
- Peripherals on a link and some of them do not support DP0, the
- write commands to program DP0 registers will generate harmless
- COMMAND_IGNORED responses that will be wired-ORed with
- responses from Peripherals which support DP0. In other words,
- the DP0 programming can be done with broadcast commands, and
- the information on the Target device can be added only in the
- BRA Header.
- (2) At the CPU level, the DAI concept is not useful for BRA; the
- machine driver will not create a dailink relying on DP0. The
- only concept that is needed is the notion of port.
- (3) The stream concept relies on a set of master_rt and slave_rt
- concepts. All of these entities represent ports and not DAIs.
- (4) With the assumption that a single BRA stream is used per link,
- that stream can connect master ports as well as all peripheral
- DP0 ports.
- (5) BRA transfers only make sense in the context of one
- Manager/Link, so the BRA stream handling does not rely on the
- concept of multi-link aggregation allowed by regular DAI links.
- Audio DMA support
- -----------------
- Some DMAs, such as HDaudio, require an audio format field to be
- set. This format is in turn used to define acceptable bursts. BPT/BRA
- support is not fully compatible with these definitions in that the
- format and bandwidth may vary between read and write commands.
- In addition, on Intel HDaudio Intel platforms the DMAs need to be
- programmed with a PCM format matching the bandwidth of the BPT/BRA
- transfer. The format is based on 192kHz 32-bit samples, and the number
- of channels varies to adjust the bandwidth. The notion of channel is
- completely notional since the data is not typical audio
- PCM. Programming such channels helps reserve enough bandwidth and adjust
- FIFO sizes to avoid xruns.
- Alignment requirements are currently not enforced at the core level
- but at the platform-level, e.g. for Intel the data sizes must be
- equal to or larger than 16 bytes.
|